Secondary Recovery Report

Secondary Recovery Reports discuss the enhanced recovery of oil in a selected Michigan fields. This series began publication in 1976 and ended in 1981.

This product is the compilation of following reports:

Item # SRR-01: Secondary Recovery Report 1: Hamilton Field, Richfield Oil Pool: Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery in Michigan, S. E. Wilson, 1976.

The Richfield Oil Pool of the Hamilton Field in Clare County, Michigan is a successful water-flood project. This was the first water-flood project in the state to use the computer to predict production. Cumulative production has exceeded original production estimates made by Sun Oil Company.

Item # SRR-02: Secondary Recovery Report 2: Beaver Creek Field, Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery in Michigan, R. J. Pollom, 1976.

The Beaver Creek Field produces from an anticlinal structure being water-flooded in the Richfield interval. Orderly development and prudent operating procedures have allowed the field to surpass its original primary production estimates by over 3,000,000 barrels of oil.

Item # SRR-03: Secondary Recovery Report No. 3: Cranberry Lake Field, Richfield Oil Pool, Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery in Michigan, S. E. Wilson, 1976.

The Cranberry Lake Field is a multilevel reservoir in northwestern Clare County. The Richfield Pool interval is being successfully flooded.

Item # SRR-04: Secondary Recovery Report 4: Enterprise Field, Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery in Michigan, A. D. Matzkanin, 1977.

The Enterprise oil field of Missaukee and Roscommon counties is a successful Richfield interval water-flood project indicated by the fact that oil production has exceeded expected primary production estimates by 42 % as of 1975.

Item # SRR-05: Secondary Recovery Report 5: Onondaga 10 Unit, Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery in Michigan, R. J. Pollom, 1977.

The Onondaga 10 Unit is the first water-flood pressure maintenance project in the State of Michigan. The project begun in August 1973 and is monitored through a computerized field instrumentation system to assure maximum production efficiency. The field has produced 4.5 million barrels of oil through June 1977, a quantity far in excess of the original primary production estimates of 2.7 million barrels.

Item # SRR-06: Secondary Recovery Report 6: Aurelius 35 Unit, Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery in Michigan, A. D. Matzkanin, 1977.

A successful pressure maintenance program began in June, 1974, on the Aurelius 35 field in Aurelius Township of Ingham County, Michigan. The implementation of pressure maintenance is expected to enhance ultimate production from the field to 32 % of recoverable original oil in place as compared to a primary recovery of 10.5 % or 805,000 barrels. Through the second quarter of 1977, total oil production has exceeded 2,280,000 barrels.

Item # SRR-07: Secondary Recovery Report 7: Columbus 3 Unit, A. D. Matzkanin, 1978.

The Columbus 3 Unit located in St. Clair County is an example of a successful pressure maintenance project. The success of such a project most often is realized through the maintenance of reservoir pressure by the injection of gas and/or water into the reservoir. However, in the case of the Columbus 3 Unit, the incremental gain of 64 percent in excess of anticipated primary production is generally the result of more efficient production of the field, achieved through selective production of the best wells as permitted through the unitization agreement.

Item # SRR-08: Secondary Recovery Report 08: West Branch Field Dundee Oil Pool Enhanced Oil & Gas Recovery in Michigan, R. G. Vugrinovich, 1981.

The West Branch oil field produces from an anticlinal structure in the Dundee Limestone. Since flooding was initiated in 1966, oil production has exceeded original primary production estimates by almost 930,000 barrels.

The product will be delivered through the download link in your email after the payment is complete, therefore make sure to provide the valid email address. The order can be cancelled within 24 hours of placement.